Some are good some are bad. Recently I got a funny one from 'Anonymous' WRT to the post below, it reads

What you are saying is not only untrue but absolutley [sic] idiotic. I know that your mind cannot be changed, but you would be wise to rethink your stance. The people who are leading this country in a dark direction, are secularist with no moral compass or backbone. People who refuse to stand up and fight terror. People who attack America instead of the real enemy. If you cannot define right and wrong, then who are you to say what we are doing is wrong. I, for one, am proud that we have a leader, who not only knows right from wrong, but who is not afraid to stand up for what he believes in. You can twist it and misrepresent it all you want, but in the long run, you will be on the wrong side of history.

So, I guess there are no secularists fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, et cetera... I guess Paul Hackett's tour through Iraq hurt America; as Rush said, he is a 'staff puke'.

But the most telling part of this little tirade is that what Pat Robertson said, hoping that more justices are eliminated so their little cabal of conservatives (who now do not have the faith of the country behind them) can rape civil liberties further, was never mentioned. Instead the reader shows total ignorance and symptoms of brain washing that you expect from a large number of Americans who do not have the capacity to think critically. Instead of standing beside Pat Robertson's words the reader began talking about terror. What the F does that have to do with anything written below? And need I remind the reader that religion, which I suspect is their 'moral compass', has killed more humans in the history of man than anything else; and no it is not mostly Islam but all religions and a extremely large chunk of this senseless slaughter was a result of Christianity and Catholicism. Furthermore, the next leading killer is nationalism which this reader expresses by saying s/he is proud of this leader (and I hope s/he meant Bush because if s/he meant Robertson then this reader is a lost cause and a threat to freedom worldwide).

Finally, I defy the reader to point to something in that post that is untrue, I made no statement other than that I hope God has mercy on Mr. Robertson. Continuing, the reader says I told him what was right and what was wrong. Again where did I say anything that was done was wrong? I said Robertson is a disgrace and I stand by it. He desires freedoms to be ripped away from Americans, if the reader stands with him on this then the reader can no longer claim to be acting in the interests of America as set up by our founding fathers because these views go directly against the grain of our republic. The reader, in this case, is on the wrong side of history.

I can only hope that the reader will return to 1) apologize, or 2) try again. But that will not happen because I suspect s/he is a troll that scourers the web, tries to type a cognitive thought, and then posts it under a cloak of anonymity. In short the reader is a coward. Otherwise perhaps s/he would go and fight in Iraq in their leader’s illegal and immoral war.